As the metropolitans continue to grow new phenonmenons are occuring; The megalopoplis, the edge city and the edgless city. The megalopolis refers to a very large metropolitan area with a dense population( of at least 10 million). An example of this would be Tokyo- Yokohama, which is pictured below. The edge city is about industrial estates; where their ae lots of high rise commercial buildings and industry but very little residential zone but their is a defined zone. Whilst an edgeless city is spiratic development of commercial and industrial zones. There is no defined edges, hences the name edgeless. However over time, this will generally turn into an edge city but not always.
![]() | ||
Yokohama- High density continues around the bay of Japan until after Tokyo |
This reading got me thinking about Australia and how hard it would be to do these metropolitan plans due to our three tier-governments. Especially from Tweed heads up to north of Brisbane, where it crosses two states boarders, interferes with numerous state and local government and is the route for national infrastructure ( pacific-highway). Do you think it would be possible to do a metropolitan plan for this area? Or do you think it would have to stop before the boarder of New South Wales?
X
The point about the three tier government making metropolitan plans difficult is important, the power struggle and competing for resources makes it difficult. I think in the face of issues like climate change that will have cross boundary impacts, an integrated approach to planning (particularly in coastal areas) is important. In terms of the Brisbane area, I'm not sure how a trans-state plan would be logistically... what do you think?
ReplyDelete