Unfortunately much of Griffin's plan was not undertaken due to the politics of the time. The 1919 plan bellow shows the amendments to the plan.
As time went on, new master plans evolved. Each plan encapsulated the new planning theories and practice of the times. The 1965- The future Canberra plan , Saw the extension of the boundaries of Canberra in order to cope with a growing population. It extended it both to the south and to the north. This plan saw the development of large arterial roads and looping suburbs, instead of gridded streets. This was a common practice of planning of the time which was seen in American cities such as Los Angeles
The 1970 “Y plan” and the 1984 “Metropolitan Policy” plan continued to fuse on the growing boundaries of the growing city. It continued to grow the transport network through all the town centres.
The current plan, the Griffin legacy of 2004 goes back to the basics of the original plan. It is about consolidating the major town centres and providing mix use and density along the transport corridors. It tries to go back to ensuring Canberra remains a Garden city,
“Canberra achieves the difficult feat of being one of the last cities beautiful. And also the World’s biggest Garden City” Hall, 2002.
The question is how can Canberra continue to be a Garden city into the future? How will future planning ensure this?
X
What is the planners role in keeping the Griffin Legacy? or not keepin it?(depending on how community want there city to be...)
ReplyDeletePhotoes are not seen. Is there a technical problem?
I think the planner needs to keep the basic Griffin model in terms of having the emphasis on developing group centres and major transport routes. I personally would like to see higher density build within these areas.The role of the planner is keeping the basic landscape that the original Griffin legacy entails and to ensure it remains relevant to that of a city of 2012 inwhich envolves working with the public. Photos are clear on my end.
ReplyDelete